![]() ![]() ![]() I buy and load a software application and my computer more than satisfies the prerequisites, but it runs slow, but nothing else runs slow, even Design 4 or EW 1 or EW 2, but EW 4 is more dependent on MFP (for some reason), Update everything, disable certain things, etc. Go through the BEFORE POSTING thread at the top and try some of the fixes there (start with FPCleaner). Unfortunately, that doesn't make it easy for you to find the problem. Kaspersky issued a fix and everything's fine now. EW just showed the flaw in the Kaspersky code and was a victim The problem was Kaspersky's, and they had to fix it. When Kaspersky AV cause EW4 to crash, there was no problem with EW4 it was doing everything as it should have. The problem is not EW (or everyone would have the same problem, logically), it's something in your system that's not playing well with EW. So, yeah, EW runs fine on the huge, huge majority of systems a few it balks on. Scrabble! Unplayable, and only because of the way it interfaced with my video card. With no problem at all, but Hasbro's Scrabble brought it to its knees. On my last computer I could play Asheron's Call (an MMORPG) Not like playing Duke Nuke 'em or WoW, but it hooks into specific display methods that need to be accommodated. EW makes new demands on the graphic subsystem. WPF? Windows Presentation Foundation-Google it for more details. On top of that, anybody who has a retail version of EW3 (as the OP did) gets to upgrade to EW4 for free, so it really was even more pointless for him to threaten an Threats are just chaff to be winnowed through, sails to have the wind taken out of, etc. We don't care whether somebody buys any MS product or not or threatens to use a competitor's product (many of us also use Dreamweaver). ![]() The smart-_ comment you reference was that poster's way of saying that this is a user-to-user forum. Not "Web Expression," "Expressions Web," "Web Expressions," or plain "Expression" or "Expressions." Not using the correct name indicates either ignorance or laziness. That order, followed by a version numeral if you wish to be specific. It's "Expression" ( singular) "Web" ( singular), in This isn't rocket science, nor neurosurgery. But it might be worth a try, and in any event I'd feel less awkward saying, "You need to read the Posting Guidelines," instead of, "You need to check the BEFORE POSTING post at the top of the thread list." -)Ĭ'mon, folks. In the subject that here are the posting guidelines, and the forum community expects you to read and heed them, we might have more folks who actually take the time to at least open the thread. Even those with experience in other forums might not realize that that is where the posting guidelines and forum FAQs are located. No mention is made of posting guidelines. The thing is, the current title doesn't indicate what it actually is. With a more imperative subject title we might get the newbies on their first venture into the forum to at least scan it enough to read the User FAQs. But the problem, as it appears to me, at least, is that no one is bothering to follow those hundreds of references anyway, especially those that are buried shoulder-deep in the old posts. I do understand that, Bill, and I have thought about it too. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |